About the Author

Gavin Thornton

Gavin Thornton is the executive director of Hawaii Appleseed Center for Law and Economic Justice.


A bill allowing this has already passed through the state Senate with no votes in opposition.

For years legislators have talked about the need to better support working families in the state. They’ve taken important steps in recent years, increasing the minimum wage and creating a working families tax credit.

Yet incomes still are not keeping pace with soaring housing prices and other costs, and families that have called Hawaii home for generations are being forced out.

This year, lawmakers had the opportunity to pass multiple proposals that could have made a difference: a state-level child tax credit; a modest rent relief fund to prevent evictions; and universal free school meals for children in public schools.

But lawmakers rejected each of these proposals. 

At the outset of the session, legislators were publicly fretting over the state budget and the financial impact of the Maui wildfires. Just weeks ago, legislators asked state department heads to prepare for the possibility of 10-15% cuts in spending on education and human services — cuts that would have been devastating for the well-being of Hawaii’s people. 

All the while they’ve been advancing Senate Bill 3289 and House Bill 2653, which would deliver a tax cut of up to $43 million for the top 0.2% wealthiest families in the state.

Gutting The Estate Tax

When a Hawaii couple passes away, if they pass along more than $11 million in assets to family and friends, the excess amount is subject to the Hawaii estate tax.

The estate tax is intended, in part, to help avoid extreme concentrations of wealth sustained across generations. This translates to disproportionate political influence and power, and undermines democratic processes, equality of opportunity and social mobility. 

Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said it well: “We can either have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” 

Proponents of the bill suggest cutting the estate tax will actually result in payment of more taxes because estate taxes not paid can be reinvested into family businesses, creating more jobs and more revenue that will be subject to tax. That concept has not worked.

Incomes still are not keeping pace with soaring housing prices and other costs.

The 400 wealthiest families in the U.S. paid an effective tax rate of 56% in 1960. By 2018, it was down to only 23% — lower than the rate paid by the bottom half of U.S. households. In 1989, the top 10% of Americans held 61% of the nation’s wealth.

By 2021 they had 70% of it. In contrast, the bottom 50% of families owned just 2.5% of the wealth. The approach of cutting taxes on the wealthy has hollowed out the middle class, creating a few billionaires and far too many families sleeping on sidewalks.

SB 3289 has already passed the Senate with no votes in opposition. It was passed out of the House Finance committee on Wednesday, and is just a few steps from the finish line at the legislature. 

HB 2653, on the other hand, actually died without being scheduled in the Senate Ways & Means committee, only to be resurrected as a zombie bill to be heard Friday — a feat that required waving Senate rules and amending an already-posted hearing notice to jam it in with only 24-hours notice.

Should the tax cut become law, it will speak volumes about our state’s priorities. For less than $43 million, lawmakers could have:

  • ensured every public school student has access to breakfast and lunch ($23 million);
  • prevented 2,500 evictions each year with a rent relief and mediation program ($13 million); or
  • provided a $325 per child tax credit for 176,000 children in low-income families, ($42 million).

They could even have picked all of the above — and more — had the Legislature advanced a proposal to tax capital gains income at the same rates as income earned from work: House Bill 1660 would have generated $135 million in revenue, 97% of which would have come from the top 5% richest households (earning $270,000 and above), and 85% of which would have come from the top 1%.

The Legislature also rejected an increase on the sales tax on multi-million dollar mansions that would have generated close to $90 million a year, much of which could have directly financed the development of new affordable housing.

If we truly want a thriving economy, where Hawaii’s working families are able to make ends meet, we need to align our policy with our stated values. We missed opportunities to gain ground this year. We cannot afford to walk backwards with estate tax cuts for the wealthy few.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

John Pritchett: Spoiler Alert


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Gavin Thornton

Gavin Thornton is the executive director of Hawaii Appleseed Center for Law and Economic Justice.


Latest Comments (0)

As the saying goes, the devil is in the details, particularly when dealing with statistics and definitions. What is "rich" and is that the guy on the news, or tutu living down the street in the same house for 50 years and finds her present net worth over $2M? Why shouldn't she be able to pass her estate down to her 4 kids without being taxed and why should the state, which bludgeons us all with one of the highest tax burdens in America, get any more flesh to squander on terrible fiscal management, over budget projects, or union mandated employee benefits?A person worth a few million in Hawaii, may not be flush with cash and there is a significant difference in being a billionaire. It is also fact that the richest 10% pay about 90% of the tax base in America. If you want to target Forbes 100, good luck, as of today taxation is income based, not net worth. Do, I feel billionaires can afford to pay more, sure thing, but what is the mechanism to do it, or do you just ask them to contribute voluntarily to the cause? In most instances, they already have philanthropic causes they can specifically spend on, circumventing the government's hand. That's the reality.

wailani1961 · 10 hours ago

If this op-ed presents the entire facts of the situation, it sounds horrifying. I'd be ashamed to be a legislator if I allowed a tax cut for the wealthiest to go through in a year like this. Wonder what happened out of public view, where the real politics happens. Regardless, when the public continually sees the wealthiest getting all the good breaks and the rest of us losing, it only makes us less and less invested in the belief that our system of government is - or at this point ever can be - fair and just.

MathewJohnson · 3 days ago

I dare anyone to look up Hawaii Revised Statutes 235-4.5, especially section (c). That's a real loophole. I hope everyone remembers it when our government starts building the projects for the rich 🏎️ and to give those the response it deserves.

marc · 3 days ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.