About the Author

Fred Spires

Fred Spires is a local businessman from Windward Oahu who enjoys golfing, eating, fly-fishing, and spending time with his wife, five children and nine grandchildren.

Hawaii lawmakers are considering bills that would provide drivers with better minimum coverage.

I was brought up with the mindset that you never take more than you need, and over the years, I maintained that belief — until last year. That was when I realized that “just enough” was not nearly enough when it came to protecting my family.

In February 2023, my wife was injured in a severe car crash with a driver who ignored posted traffic signs, slammed into her vehicle, and sent her into the path of oncoming traffic, where she was hit again, head-on. Her SUV looked like it had been pried open with a can opener. The whole front and driver side of her vehicle were obliterated.

Miraculously, my wife did not need to go to the hospital. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t injured, though. She was hit so hard that the bruises didn’t show up until the next day. She had neck and back strains.

The impact of the crash, coupled with the force from the airbags, caused significant bruising on the entire left side of her body.

We had insurance, but it was only what I thought we needed: $20,000. The other driver had nothing.

There are billions of people in this world, but I never expected that my wife or I would get into an accident. You don’t realize that the $20,000 minimum insurance did little to nothing to help our family when we needed it most.

We still have medical bills coming in. Our car, which was paid off, was totaled. Now, in addition to emergency and ongoing medical costs, we have years of car payments for a replacement car, and thousands of dollars in interest ahead of us.

When I realized how minimal Hawaii’s motor vehicle insurance coverage was, I called my insurance agent and asked for more. I more than doubled my coverage for both of our vehicles, and you know what it cost? About $15 a month for two vehicles and tens of thousands more dollars in protection for my wife and myself.

This should be the norm. It is why lawmakers are considering two bills, House Bill 1539 and Senate Bill 2342, that would provide drivers with better minimum coverage.

More Education Needed

There are a lot of people out there like me who believe that they are doing the right thing by just getting the bare minimum coverage. People do not understand how insurance works.

We need to be educated to understand the ins and outs of the different types of coverage, what they mean, and how they work. The public needs to know what minimum amount they actually need in order to properly protect them and others in the event of an accident.

I can tell you right now, the reality is that the $20,000 minimum does not work and will not work.
$20,000 is just not enough to cover what needs to be covered.

This accident changed the way my wife does things. She has flashbacks and ongoing pain. She went to physical therapy for months and still goes to a chiropractor. We pay nearly $200 every month out of our own pocket and probably will for some time. Her quality of life will never be the same.

People do not understand how insurance works.

We are lucky. My wife survived, and while she will likely be dealing with the aftereffects of the crash for the rest of her life, she is here. She can walk, work, and enjoy life.

But that is not the case for many other families whose loved ones are incapacitated. While there is no amount of money that could make up for that, increasing the minimum auto insurance requirement is a crucial step in the right direction. It is a necessary step, and lawmakers need to act now.

I am a frugal guy, but I am willing to pay more for auto insurance to protect my family. I know times are tough, but if spending the extra $5 to $15 a month adds tens of thousands of dollars in extra protection for your family, isn’t that worth the investment?

It is amazing how far $15 goes when you put it into perspective.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Publicly Financed Elections Would Unlock Opportunities For Women


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Fred Spires

Fred Spires is a local businessman from Windward Oahu who enjoys golfing, eating, fly-fishing, and spending time with his wife, five children and nine grandchildren.


Latest Comments (0)

Just fyi, In California, "effective 1/1/25 the minimum liability insurance requirements for private passenger vehicles will increase as follows: $30,000 for injury/death to one person; $60,000 for injury/death to more than one person. $15,000 for damage to property."

MarkS_OceanDem · 2 days ago

While I assume you are referring to minimum PIP coverage, the fact is most people have additional health insurance that will kick in when your $20K in PIP benefits are exhausted. First point is the state requires drivers to buy PIP coverage even though they probably already have health insurance that will cover you in an auto accident. If you want to buy additional PIP that's your choice, but if you have health insurance from your employer, why spend more? Also, the threshold to file suit against the at fault driver is $10K, or the minimum amount of PIP you are required to buy. That is of course if the at fault driver has ANY insurance.Which brings me to the root of this dilemma. Rather than raise the limit for drivers that do comply with the law, why not put in place better mechanisms to make sure all drivers have insurance? With AI and increasing technology there should be no way anyone is on the road without insurance. It's estimated close to 1/3 of drivers skirt the law, making the other 2/3's pay for the uninsured versus spreading the cost of insurance out amongst the full 100%. That is what is needed and what is fair for all drivers.

wailani1961 · 1 week ago

You’ve been driving around without adequate insurance. Did you ever consider the harm you and your wife could do and the morality of not insuring against it?Not sympathetic about your uninsured driver. You had to affirmatively decline underinsured/uninsured coverage. Willful blindness is not prudence or frugality. It is extreme self-centeredness.

JimWright · 1 week ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.